By Edward Foley
The 2000 presidential election, with its difficulties in Florida, was once now not the 1st significant vote-counting controversy within the nation's history--nor the final. poll Battles lines the evolution of America's adventure with those disputes, from 1776 to now, explaining why they've got proved again and again not easy and delivering an institutional solution"
summary: The 2000 presidential election, with its difficulties in Florida, was once no longer the 1st significant vote-counting controversy within the nation's history--nor the final. poll Battles lines the evolution of America's event with those disputes, from 1776 to now, explaining why they've got proved over and over tricky and supplying an institutional answer"
Read or Download Ballot battles: the history of disputed elections in the United States PDF
Similar legal history books
This publication is the 1st significant research of England's greatest and best-known witch trial; which came about in 1612, whilst ten witches have been arraigned and hung within the village of Pendle in Lancashire. during this quantity, eleven specialists from quite a few fields provide new surveys of those occasions and their meanings for contemporaries, for later generations, and for the current day.
The Federal Acknowledgment technique (FAP) is without doubt one of the most vital and contentious concerns dealing with local americans this present day. a classy procedure of standards and methods, the FAP is used by federal officers to figure out no matter if a local group qualifies for federal reputation via the us executive.
A few of the rules accepted in glossy Islamic agreement legislation and advertisement perform stay kind of like these defined through the Qur'an and the Prophet Muhammad, and expounded by means of students of jurisprudence way back to the thirteenth century, regardless of the development in time and class of business interplay.
Examines the theoretical and sensible outlook of forensic physicians in Imperial Russia, from the 18th to the early twentieth centuries, arguing that the interplay among nation and those execs formed approaches of reform in modern Russia. It demonstrates the ways that the pro evolution of forensic psychiatry in Russia took a unique flip from Western versions, and the way the method of professionalization in past due imperial Russia grew to become linked to liberal felony reform and resulted in the transformation of the autocratic kingdom procedure.
- Inferno : an anatomy of American punishment
- The Invention of Party Politics: Federalism, Popular Sovereignty, and Constitutional Development in Jacksonian Illinois
- The Great Catastrophe of My Life: Divorce in the Old Dominion
- A Good Quarrel: America's Top Legal Reporters Share Stories from Inside the Supreme Court
- The Shooting Salvationist: J. Frank Norris and the Murder Trial that Captivated America
- Inferno : an anatomy of American punishment
Extra info for Ballot battles: the history of disputed elections in the United States
Considering the petition only, and not the evidence presented to the council in support of it, the opinion took apart the petition’s allegations one by one. ” To support this point, the opinion added another policy argument that would reappear throughout American history in cases of disputed elections: If elections were to be set aside for irregularities which do not affect, obviously and materially, the truth of the poll, the craft of the Judges or Inspectors might lead them to contrive such departure from duty, or to commit some irregularity, in order to overturn an election, in case they dislike the event of it.
Lawyers, indeed, generally pursue their craft in reverse chronological order: all else being equal, the most recent precedent is the most germane, and one need not search further back in time once one has found a newer case on point. I n t r o d u c t i o n 19 That this book starts with the Founding of the Republic signifies a key claim that the book makes: to achieve progress in improving the nation’s processes for resolving ballot-counting controversies, it is necessary to go all the way back to the nation’s beginning.
May have been sincere in their professed desire for the impartiality of a judicial opinion, but the two judges who complied with their request—Chief Justice Thomas McKean and Associate Justice George Bryan—happened to have solid Radical credentials. 31 In any event, the opinion delivered took the position that this group sought: the election should not be nullified just because some wrongdoing had occurred. Considering the petition only, and not the evidence presented to the council in support of it, the opinion took apart the petition’s allegations one by one.